
The Principles Of Judicial Proof
Condition: SECONDHAND
This is a secondhand book. The jacket image is a photograph of the exact copy we have in stock. This image shows the condition of this book. Further condition remarks are below.
Author: John Henry Wigmore
Binding: Hardback
Published: The Legal Classics Library, 1991
Condition:
Book: Very good
Jacket: No dust jacket - cloth/board in good condition
Pages: Good
Markings: No markings
This seminal legal text, The Principles Of Judicial Proof, presents a comprehensive examination of the methodologies and theories underpinning the presentation and evaluation of evidence in a courtroom setting. It meticulously details the logical and psychological foundations of proof, instructing legal professionals and scholars on the art of persuasion and the science of fact-finding. Wigmore's authoritative work argues for a systematic approach to understanding the weight and admissibility of testimony and exhibits. The volume illustrates the intricate process by which legal conclusions are drawn from disparate pieces of information, offering an indispensable guide to the complexities of judicial reasoning.
Author: John Henry Wigmore
Binding: Hardback
Published: The Legal Classics Library, 1991
Condition:
Book: Very good
Jacket: No dust jacket - cloth/board in good condition
Pages: Good
Markings: No markings
This seminal legal text, The Principles Of Judicial Proof, presents a comprehensive examination of the methodologies and theories underpinning the presentation and evaluation of evidence in a courtroom setting. It meticulously details the logical and psychological foundations of proof, instructing legal professionals and scholars on the art of persuasion and the science of fact-finding. Wigmore's authoritative work argues for a systematic approach to understanding the weight and admissibility of testimony and exhibits. The volume illustrates the intricate process by which legal conclusions are drawn from disparate pieces of information, offering an indispensable guide to the complexities of judicial reasoning.
