The Anatomy Of A Constitutional Law Case: Youngstown Sheet And Tube Co. V. Sawyer, The Steel Seizure Decision
Condition: SECONDHAND
This is a secondhand book. The jacket image is a photograph of the exact copy we have in stock. This image shows the condition of this book. Further condition remarks are below.
Author: Alan F. Westin
Binding: Hardback
Published: The Legal Classics Library, 1996
Condition:
Book: Very good
Jacket: No dust jacket - cloth/board in good condition
Pages: Good
Markings: No markings
Condition remarks: Notes from the Editor included.
This incisive legal analysis presents a detailed examination of Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. Sawyer, a pivotal Supreme Court decision that profoundly shaped the understanding of presidential power in the United States. Alan F. Westin chronicles the intricate arguments and judicial reasoning behind the Steel Seizure Case, illustrating the complex interplay between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches during a national crisis. The work argues for the enduring relevance of this landmark ruling in contemporary constitutional discourse, offering a rigorous academic perspective on its historical context and lasting implications. It uncovers the nuances of constitutional interpretation, providing essential insights for students and scholars of American law and political science.
Author: Alan F. Westin
Binding: Hardback
Published: The Legal Classics Library, 1996
Condition:
Book: Very good
Jacket: No dust jacket - cloth/board in good condition
Pages: Good
Markings: No markings
Condition remarks: Notes from the Editor included.
This incisive legal analysis presents a detailed examination of Youngstown Sheet and Tube Co. v. Sawyer, a pivotal Supreme Court decision that profoundly shaped the understanding of presidential power in the United States. Alan F. Westin chronicles the intricate arguments and judicial reasoning behind the Steel Seizure Case, illustrating the complex interplay between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches during a national crisis. The work argues for the enduring relevance of this landmark ruling in contemporary constitutional discourse, offering a rigorous academic perspective on its historical context and lasting implications. It uncovers the nuances of constitutional interpretation, providing essential insights for students and scholars of American law and political science.